Search

Software Engineer's Notes

Tag

security

Cryptographically Secure Pseudo-Random Number Generator (CSPRNG)

What is Cryptographically Secure Pseudo-Random Number Generator?

In modern computing, randomness plays a vital role in security, encryption, authentication, and even everyday applications. But not all randomness is created equal. When dealing with sensitive data, we need something much stronger than just “random”—we need cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generators (CSPRNGs). In this blog, we’ll explore what they are, their history, how they work, and why they’re so important in software development.

What is a Cryptographically Secure Pseudo-Random Number Generator?

A CSPRNG is a type of algorithm that generates numbers that appear random but are actually produced by a deterministic process. Unlike regular pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs), which may be predictable with enough knowledge of their internal state, CSPRNGs are specifically designed to withstand cryptographic attacks.

In other words, even if an attacker observes many outputs from a CSPRNG, they should not be able to determine the next output or deduce the internal state.

A Brief History of CSPRNGs

The history of random number generation in cryptography dates back to the early days of secure communications:

  • 1940s – WWII era: Randomness was used in encryption systems like the one-time pad, which relied on truly random keys. However, generating and distributing such randomness securely was impractical.
  • 1960s–1970s: As computers evolved, researchers began designing algorithms to simulate randomness. Early pseudo-random generators (like Linear Congruential Generators) were fast but not secure for cryptographic use.
  • 1980s–1990s: With the rise of public-key cryptography (RSA, Diffie-Hellman), stronger random number generation became critical. This led to the development of algorithms like Blum Blum Shub (1986) and Yarrow (1999).
  • 2000s–Today: Modern operating systems now include secure random number sources, such as /dev/random and /dev/urandom in Unix-like systems, and CryptGenRandom or CNG in Windows. Algorithms like Fortuna and HMAC_DRBG are widely used in cryptographic libraries.

Features and Characteristics of CSPRNGs

CSPRNGs are different from regular PRNGs because they meet strict cryptographic requirements. Key features include:

  1. Unpredictability: Given past outputs, the next output cannot be guessed.
  2. Resistance to State Compromise: Even if some internal state is leaked, it should not compromise past or future outputs.
  3. High Entropy Source: They often draw from unpredictable system events (e.g., mouse movements, keystrokes, network interrupts).
  4. Deterministic Expansion: Once seeded with secure entropy, they can generate large amounts of secure random data.
  5. Standards Compliance: Many are defined by standards like NIST SP 800-90A.

How Does a CSPRNG Work?

At its core, a CSPRNG works in two stages:

  1. Seeding (Entropy Collection):
    The system gathers entropy from unpredictable sources like hardware noise, CPU timings, or environmental factors.
  2. Expansion (Pseudo-Random Generation):
    The seed is processed through a secure algorithm (such as AES in counter mode, SHA-256 hashing, or HMAC). This allows the generator to produce a long stream of secure pseudo-random numbers.

For example:

  • A hash-based CSPRNG applies a secure hash function to seed data repeatedly.
  • A block cipher-based CSPRNG encrypts counters with a secret seed to produce outputs.

Both approaches ensure that the output is indistinguishable from true randomness.

Why is it Important?

CSPRNGs are the backbone of modern security. Without them, encryption and authentication systems would be predictable and vulnerable. Their importance spans across:

  • Key Generation: Secure keys for symmetric and asymmetric cryptography.
  • Session Tokens: Secure identifiers for logins and sessions.
  • Nonces and IVs: Ensuring uniqueness in encryption schemes.
  • Password Salt Generation: Preventing rainbow table attacks.

Without cryptographic security in random numbers, attackers could exploit weaknesses and compromise entire systems.

Advantages and Benefits

  1. Security Assurance: Provides unpredictable randomness that resists cryptanalysis.
  2. Scalability: Can produce large amounts of random data from a small seed.
  3. Versatility: Used in encryption, authentication, simulations, and secure protocols.
  4. Backward and Forward Secrecy: Protects both past and future outputs even if part of the state is exposed.
  5. Standardization: Recognized and trusted across industries.

When and How Should We Use It?

You should use CSPRNGs whenever randomness has a security impact:

  • Generating cryptographic keys (RSA, AES, ECC).
  • Creating session identifiers or API tokens.
  • Producing salts and nonces for password hashing and encryption.
  • In secure protocols (TLS, SSH, IPsec).

For non-security tasks (like shuffling items in a game), a regular PRNG may suffice. But for anything involving sensitive data, always use a CSPRNG.

Integrating CSPRNGs into Software Development

Most modern languages and frameworks provide built-in CSPRNG libraries. Integration usually involves using the recommended secure API instead of regular random functions. Examples:

  • Java: SecureRandom class.
  • Python: secrets module or os.urandom().
  • C/C++: getrandom(), /dev/urandom, or libraries like OpenSSL.
  • JavaScript (Web): window.crypto.getRandomValues().
  • .NET: RNGCryptoServiceProvider or RandomNumberGenerator.

Best Practices for Integration:

  • Always use language-provided CSPRNG libraries (don’t roll your own).
  • Ensure proper seeding with entropy from the OS.
  • Use latest libraries that comply with security standards.
  • Apply code reviews and security audits to confirm correct usage.

Conclusion

Cryptographically Secure Pseudo-Random Number Generators are one of the unsung heroes of modern computing. They ensure that our communications, logins, and transactions remain safe from attackers. By understanding their history, characteristics, and applications, we can better integrate them into our software development processes and build secure systems.

Whenever security is at stake, always rely on a CSPRNG—because in cryptography, true randomness matters.

Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL): A Practical Guide

What is Simple Authentication and Security Layer?

SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) is a framework that adds pluggable authentication and optional post-authentication security (integrity/confidentiality) to application protocols such as SMTP, IMAP, POP3, LDAP, XMPP, AMQP 1.0, Kafka, and more. Instead of hard-coding one login method into each protocol, SASL lets clients and servers negotiate from a menu of mechanisms (e.g., SCRAM, Kerberos/GSSAPI, OAuth bearer tokens, etc.).

What Is SASL?

SASL is a protocol-agnostic authentication layer defined so that an application protocol (like IMAP or LDAP) can “hook in” standardized auth exchanges without reinventing them. It specifies:

  • How a client and server negotiate an authentication mechanism
  • How they exchange challenges and responses for that mechanism
  • Optionally, how they enable a security layer after auth (message integrity and/or encryption)

Key idea: SASL = negotiation + mechanism plug-ins, not a single algorithm.

How SASL Works (Step by Step)

  1. Advertise capabilities
    The server advertises supported SASL mechanisms (e.g., SCRAM-SHA-256, GSSAPI, PLAIN, OAUTHBEARER).
  2. Client selects mechanism
    The client picks one mechanism it supports (optionally sending an initial response).
  3. Challenge–response exchange
    The server sends a challenge; the client replies with mechanism-specific data (proofs, nonces, tickets, tokens, etc.). Multiple rounds may occur.
  4. Authentication result
    On success, the server confirms authentication. Some mechanisms can now negotiate a security layer (per-message integrity/confidentiality). In practice, most modern deployments use TLS for the transport layer and skip SASL’s own security layer.
  5. Application traffic
    The client proceeds with the protocol (fetch mail, query directory, produce to Kafka, etc.), now authenticated (and protected by TLS and/or the SASL layer if negotiated).

Core Components & Concepts

  • Mechanism: The algorithm/protocol used to authenticate (e.g., SCRAM-SHA-256, GSSAPI, OAUTHBEARER, PLAIN).
  • Initial response: Optional first payload sent with the mechanism selection.
  • Challenge/response: The back-and-forth messages carrying proofs and metadata.
  • Security layer: Optional integrity/confidentiality after auth (distinct from TLS).
  • Channel binding: A way to bind auth to the outer TLS channel to prevent MITM downgrades (used by mechanisms like SCRAM with channel binding).

Common SASL Mechanisms (When to Use What)

MechanismWhat it isUse whenNotes
SCRAM-SHA-256/512Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism using SHA-2You want strong password auth with no plaintext passwords on the wire and hashed+salted storageModern default for many systems (Kafka, PostgreSQL ≥10). Supports channel binding variants.
GSSAPI (Kerberos)Enterprise single sign-on via Kerberos ticketsYou have an Active Directory / Kerberos realm and want SSOExcellent for internal corp networks; more setup complexity.
OAUTHBEAREROAuth 2.0 bearer tokens in SASLYou issue/verify OAuth tokensGreat for cloud/microservices; aligns with identity providers (IdPs).
EXTERNALUse external credentials from the transport (e.g., TLS client cert)You use mutual TLSNo passwords; trust comes from certificates.
PLAINUsername/password in clear (over TLS)You already enforce TLS everywhere and need simplicityEasy but must require TLS. Do not use without TLS.
CRAM-MD5 / DIGEST-MD5Legacy challenge-responseLegacy interop onlyConsider migrating to SCRAM.

Practical default today: TLS + SCRAM-SHA-256 (or TLS + OAUTHBEARER if you already run OAuth).

Advantages & Benefits

  • Pluggable & future-proof: Swap mechanisms without changing the application protocol.
  • Centralized policy: Standardizes auth across many services.
  • Better password handling (with SCRAM): No plaintext at rest, resistant to replay.
  • Enterprise SSO (with GSSAPI): Kerberos tickets instead of passwords.
  • Cloud-friendly (with OAUTHBEARER): Leverage existing IdP and token lifecycles.
  • Interoperability: Widely implemented in mail, messaging, directory services, and databases.

When & How Should You Use SASL?

Use SASL when your protocol (or product) supports it natively and you need one or more of:

  • Strong password auth with modern hashing ⇒ choose SCRAM-SHA-256/512.
  • Single Sign-On in enterprise ⇒ choose GSSAPI (Kerberos).
  • IdP integration & short-lived credentials ⇒ choose OAUTHBEARER.
  • mTLS-based trust ⇒ choose EXTERNAL.
  • Simplicity under TLSPLAIN (TLS mandatory).

Deployment principles

  • Always enable TLS (or equivalent) even if the mechanism supports a security layer.
  • Prefer SCRAM over legacy mechanisms when using passwords.
  • Enforce mechanism allow-lists (e.g., disable PLAIN if TLS is off).
  • Use channel binding where available.
  • Centralize secrets in a secure vault and rotate regularly.

Real-World Use Cases (Deep-Dive)

1) Email: SMTP, IMAP, POP3

  • Goal: Authenticate mail clients to servers.
  • Mechanisms: PLAIN (over TLS), LOGIN (non-standard but common), SCRAM, OAUTHBEARER/XOAUTH2 for providers with OAuth.
  • Flow: Client connects with STARTTLS or SMTPS/IMAPS → server advertises mechanisms → client authenticates → proceeds to send/receive mail.
  • Why SASL: Broad client interop, ability to modernize from PLAIN to SCRAM/OAuth without changing SMTP/IMAP themselves.

2) LDAP Directory (SASL Bind)

  • Goal: Authenticate users/applications to a directory (OpenLDAP, 389-ds).
  • Mechanisms: GSSAPI (Kerberos SSO), EXTERNAL (TLS client certs), SCRAM, PLAIN (with TLS).
  • Why SASL: Flexible enterprise auth: service accounts via SCRAM, employees via Kerberos.

3) Kafka Producers/Consumers

  • Goal: Secure cluster access per client/app.
  • Mechanisms: SASL/SCRAM-SHA-256, SASL/OAUTHBEARER, SASL/GSSAPI in some shops.
  • Why SASL: Centralize identity, attach ACLs per principal, rotate secrets/tokens cleanly.

Kafka client example (SCRAM-SHA-256):

# client.properties
security.protocol=SASL_SSL
sasl.mechanism=SCRAM-SHA-256
sasl.jaas.config=org.apache.kafka.common.security.scram.ScramLoginModule required \
 username="app-user" \
 password="s3cr3t";

4) XMPP (Jabber)

  • Goal: Client-to-server and server-to-server auth.
  • Mechanisms: SCRAM, EXTERNAL (certs), sometimes GSSAPI.
  • Why SASL: Clean negotiation, modern password handling, works across diverse servers/clients.

5) PostgreSQL ≥ 10 (Database Logins)

  • Goal: Strong password auth for DB clients.
  • Mechanisms: SASL/SCRAM-SHA-256 preferred over MD5.
  • Why SASL: Mitigates plaintext/MD5 weaknesses; supports channel binding with TLS.

6) AMQP 1.0 Messaging (e.g., Apache Qpid, Azure Service Bus)

  • Goal: Authenticate publishers/consumers.
  • Mechanisms: PLAIN (over TLS), EXTERNAL, OAUTHBEARER depending on broker.
  • Why SASL: AMQP 1.0 defines SASL for its handshake, so it’s the standard path.

Implementation Patterns (Developers & Operators)

Choose mechanisms

  • Default: TLS + SCRAM-SHA-256
  • Enterprise SSO: TLS + GSSAPI
  • Cloud IdP: TLS + OAUTHBEARER (short-lived tokens)

Server hardening checklist

  • Require TLS for all auth (disable cleartext fallbacks)
  • Allow-list mechanisms (disable weak/legacy ones)
  • Rate-limit authentication attempts
  • Rotate secrets/tokens; enforce password policy for SCRAM
  • Audit successful/failed auths; alert on anomalies
  • Enable channel binding (if supported)

Client best practices

  • Verify server certificates and hostnames
  • Prefer SCRAM over PLAIN where offered
  • Cache/refresh OAuth tokens properly
  • Fail closed if the server downgrades mechanisms or TLS

Example: SMTP AUTH with SASL PLAIN (over TLS)

Use only over TLS. PLAIN sends credentials in a single base64-encoded blob.

S: 220 mail.example.com ESMTP
C: EHLO client.example
S: 250-AUTH PLAIN SCRAM-SHA-256
C: STARTTLS
S: 220 Ready to start TLS
... (TLS negotiated) ...
C: AUTH PLAIN AHVzZXJuYW1lAHN1cGVyLXNlY3JldA==
S: 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful

If available, prefer:

C: AUTH SCRAM-SHA-256 <initial-client-response>

SCRAM protects against replay and stores salted, hashed passwords server-side.

Limitations & Gotchas

  • Not a silver bullet: SASL standardizes auth, but you still need TLS, good secrets hygiene, and strong ACLs.
  • Mechanism mismatches: Client/Server must overlap on at least one mechanism.
  • Legacy clients: Some only support PLAIN/LOGIN; plan for a migration path.
  • Operational complexity: Kerberos and OAuth introduce infrastructure to manage.
  • Security layer confusion: Most deployments rely on TLS instead of SASL’s own integrity/confidentiality layer; ensure your team understands the difference.

Integration Into Your Software Development Process

Design phase

  • Decide your identity model (passwords vs. Kerberos vs. OAuth).
  • Select mechanisms accordingly; document the allow-list.

Implementation

  • Use well-maintained libraries (mail, LDAP, Kafka clients, Postgres drivers) that support your chosen mechanisms.
  • Wire in TLS first, then SASL.
  • Add config flags to switch mechanisms per environment (dev/stage/prod).

Testing

  • Unit tests for mechanism negotiation and error handling.
  • Integration tests in CI with TLS on and mechanism allow-lists enforced.
  • Negative tests: expired OAuth tokens, wrong SCRAM password, TLS downgrade attempts.

Operations

  • Centralize secrets in a vault; automate rotation.
  • Monitor auth logs; alert on brute-force patterns.
  • Periodically reassess supported mechanisms (deprecate legacy ones).

Summary

SASL gives you a clean, extensible way to add strong authentication to many protocols without bolting on one-off solutions. In modern systems, pairing TLS with SCRAM, GSSAPI, or OAUTHBEARER delivers robust security, smooth migrations, and broad interoperability—whether you’re running mail servers, directories, message brokers, or databases.

Understanding the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) System

When working in cybersecurity or software development, you may often hear about “CVE numbers” associated with vulnerabilities. But what exactly is the CVE system, and why is it so important? Let’s break it down.

What is the CVE System and Database?

CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) is an international system that provides a standardized method of identifying and referencing publicly known cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
Each vulnerability is assigned a unique CVE Identifier (CVE-ID) such as CVE-2020-11988.

The official CVE database stores and catalogs these vulnerabilities, making them accessible for IT professionals, vendors, and security researchers worldwide. It ensures that everyone talks about the same issue in the same way.

Read more: Understanding the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) System

Who Maintains the CVE System?

The CVE system is maintained by MITRE Corporation, a non-profit organization funded by the U.S. government.
Additionally, the CVE Program is overseen by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

MITRE works with a network of CVE Numbering Authorities (CNAs) — organizations authorized to assign CVE IDs, such as major tech companies (Microsoft, Oracle, Google) and security research firms.

Benefits of the CVE System

  • Standardization: Provides a universal reference for vulnerabilities.
  • Transparency: Public access allows anyone to verify details.
  • Collaboration: Security vendors, researchers, and organizations can align their efforts.
  • Integration: Many tools (scanners, patch managers, vulnerability databases like NVD) rely on CVE IDs.
  • Prioritization: Helps organizations track and assess vulnerabilities consistently.

When and How Should We Use It?

You should use the CVE system whenever:

  • Assessing Security Risks – Check if your software or systems are affected by known CVEs.
  • Patch Management – Identify what vulnerabilities a patch addresses.
  • Vulnerability Scanning – Automated tools often map findings to CVE IDs.
  • Security Reporting – Reference CVE IDs when documenting incidents or compliance reports.

CVE Data Fields

Each CVE entry contains several fields to provide context and clarity. Common fields include:

  • CVE ID: Unique identifier (e.g., CVE-2021-34527).
  • Description: Summary of the vulnerability.
  • References: Links to advisories, vendor notes, and technical details.
  • Date Published/Modified: Timeline of updates.
  • Affected Products: List of impacted software, versions, or vendors.
  • Severity Information: Sometimes includes metrics like CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) scores.

Reporting New Vulnerabilities

If you discover a new security vulnerability, here’s how the reporting process typically works:

  1. Report to Vendor – Contact the software vendor or organization directly.
  2. CNA Assignment – If the vendor is a CNA, they can assign a CVE ID.
  3. Third-Party CNAs – If the vendor is not a CNA, you can submit the vulnerability to another authorized CNA or directly to MITRE.
  4. Validation and Publishing – The CNA/MITRE verifies the vulnerability, assigns a CVE ID, and publishes it in the database.

This process ensures consistency and that all stakeholders can quickly take action.

Final Thoughts

The CVE system is the backbone of vulnerability tracking in cybersecurity. By using CVEs, security professionals, vendors, and organizations can ensure they are talking about the same issues, prioritize fixes, and strengthen defenses.

Staying aware of CVEs — and contributing when new vulnerabilities are found — is essential for building a safer digital world.

Understanding Central Authentication Service (CAS): A Complete Guide

When building modern applications and enterprise systems, managing user authentication across multiple services is often a challenge. One solution that has stood the test of time is the Central Authentication Service (CAS) protocol. In this post, we’ll explore what CAS is, its history, how it works, who uses it, and its pros and cons.

What is CAS?

The Central Authentication Service (CAS) is an open-source, single sign-on (SSO) protocol that allows users to access multiple applications with just one set of login credentials. Instead of requiring separate logins for each application, CAS authenticates the user once and then shares that authentication with other trusted systems.

This makes it particularly useful in organizations where users need seamless access to a variety of internal and external services.

A Brief History of CAS

CAS was originally developed at Yale University in 2001 to solve the problem of students and faculty needing multiple logins for different campus systems.

Over the years, CAS has evolved into a widely adopted open standard, supported by the Apereo Foundation (a nonprofit organization that also manages open-source educational software projects). Today, CAS is actively maintained and widely used in higher education, enterprises, and government systems.

How CAS Works: The Protocol

The CAS protocol is based on the principle of single sign-on through ticket validation. Here’s a simplified breakdown of how it works:

  1. User Access Request
    A user tries to access a protected application (called a “CAS client”).
  2. Redirection to CAS Server
    If the user is not yet authenticated, the client redirects them to the CAS server (centralized authentication service).
  3. User Authentication
    The CAS server prompts the user to log in (username/password or another supported method).
  4. Ticket Granting
    Once authenticated, the CAS server issues a ticket (a unique token) and redirects the user back to the client.
  5. Ticket Validation
    The client contacts the CAS server to validate the ticket. If valid, the user is granted access.
  6. Single Sign-On
    For subsequent applications, the user does not need to re-enter credentials. CAS recognizes the existing session and provides access automatically.

This ticket-based flow ensures security, while the centralized server manages authentication logic.

Who Uses CAS?

CAS is widely adopted across different domains:

  • Universities & Colleges → Many higher education institutions rely on CAS to provide seamless login across portals, course systems, and email services.
  • Government Agencies → Used to simplify user access across multiple public-facing systems.
  • Enterprises → Adopted by businesses for internal systems integration.
  • Open-source Projects → Integrated into tools that require centralized authentication.

When to Use CAS?

CAS is a great choice when:

  • You have multiple applications that require login.
  • You want to reduce password fatigue for users.
  • Security and centralized authentication management are critical.
  • You prefer an open-source, standards-based protocol with strong community support.

If your system is small or only requires one authentication endpoint, CAS might be overkill.

Advantages of CAS

Single Sign-On (SSO): Users only log in once and gain access to multiple services.
Open-Source & Flexible: Backed by the Apereo community with strong support.
Wide Integration Support: Works with web, desktop, and mobile applications.
Extensible Authentication Methods: Supports username/password, multi-factor authentication, LDAP, OAuth, and more.
Strong Security Model: Ticket validation ensures tokens cannot be reused across systems.

Disadvantages of CAS

Initial Setup Complexity: Requires configuring both CAS server and client applications.
Overhead for Small Systems: If you only have one or two applications, CAS may add unnecessary complexity.
Learning Curve: Developers and administrators need to understand the CAS flow, ticketing, and integration details.
Dependency on CAS Server Availability: If the CAS server goes down, authentication for all connected apps may fail.

Conclusion

The Central Authentication Service (CAS) remains one of the most robust and reliable single sign-on protocols in use today. With its origins in academia and adoption across industries, it has proven to be a secure, scalable solution for organizations that need centralized authentication.

If your system involves multiple applications and user logins, adopting CAS could streamline your authentication strategy, improve user experience, and strengthen overall security.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑